Nppf heritage harm
Web23 jul. 2024 · Where changes are proposed, the National Planning Policy Framework sets out a clear framework for both plan-making and decision-making in respect of … WebHC1: Heritage Conservation and Growth, the now current policy, did not pull in an identifiably different direction from the corresponding policies 7.4, 7.8, ... traditional bell making on the site has certainly caused some harm, that harm is very clearly less than substantial, and nothing whatsoever to do with the proposals at issue
Nppf heritage harm
Did you know?
Web12 dec. 2024 · Any harm to, or loss of, the significance of a designated heritage asset (from its alteration or destruction, or from development within its setting), should require clear and convincing justification. Substantial … Webwill lead to less than substantial harm to the significance of a designated heritage asset, this harm should be weighed against the public benefits of the proposal”. 3.12 The policies of the NPPF only recognise two categories of harm to designated heritage assets: • Substantial Harm: the PPG on Historic Environment July 2024
Web“I mean what I say, and I say what I mean” • R (James Hall) v City of Bradford MDC [2024] EWHC 2899 (Admin) – Regarding categories of harm, there are no others besides those set out in the NPPF – There is no category in the NPPF of “minimal heritage harm” – No harm, less than substantial harm, substantial harm • R (Asda Stores Ltd) v Leeds CC [2024] … Web24 jun. 2024 · By implication, it identifies four levels of harm that may be caused to the significance of heritage assets: total loss (this is often overlooked but is written in to the …
WebThe definition of “Conservation (for heritage policy)” in the NPPF did not exclude “countervailing benefits”. It implied that “great weight” must attach both to any harm to the significance of the heritage asset and to any enhancement of it – such as the appeal proposals would achieve. 194.In determining applications, local planning authorities should require an applicant to describe the significance of any heritage assets affected, including any contribution made by their setting. The level of detail should be proportionate to the assets’ importance and no more than is sufficient to … Meer weergeven 199.When considering the impact of a proposed development on the significance of a designated heritage asset, great weight should … Meer weergeven (66) Some World Heritage Sites are inscribed by UNESCO to be of natural significance rather than cultural significance; and in some cases they are inscribed for both their natural and cultural significance. … Meer weergeven
WebOtherwise, opportunity is taken to neatly align the application of national heritage policy (paragraph 193) with the application of the statutory heritage duties in light of heritage case law since the introduction of the Framework in 2012. The new NPPF emphasises that great weight should be given to the conservation of designated heritage ...
Web11 mrt. 2024 · The NPPF does not direct the decision-maker to adopt any specific approach to identifying “harm” or gauging its extent. [74] f. Identifying and assessing any “benefits” … over policing communities of colorWeb12 mrt. 2024 · The NPPF does not direct the decision-maker to adopt any specific approach to identifying “harm” or gauging its extent. It distinguishes the approach required in … over policed and under protectedWeb16 jun. 2024 · NPPF heritage tests Part 16 of the NPPF sets out the national planning policies on conserving and enhancing the historic environment. Where relevant, these policies will be material... over plucked eyebrowsWebHeritage asset A building, monument, site, place, area or landscape identified as having a degree of significance meriting consideration in planning decisions, because of its … ramshorn menuWeb16 mrt. 2016 · The judge said paragraph 134 of the NPPF, which requires any "less than substantial harm to the significance of a designated heritage asset" to be "weighed against the public benefits of the proposal", was a 'specific policy' for these purposes. over policedWeb22 nov. 2024 · The fact that the harm may be limited or negligible will plainly go to the weight to be given to it as recognised in Paragraph 193 NPPF. However, in my judgment, … rams horn locations in michiganWebSo, the key matter was whether, prior to engaging paragraphs 195 and 196 of the NPPF (which apply to cases where a development proposal will lead to substantial / less than substantial harm), an ‘internal heritage balance’ should be carried out where elements of heritage harm and benefit are first weighed up to establish whether there is ... over policing and under policing